Película Foma Retropan 320 - Película de 35 mm
Una emulsión maravillosamente suave: con un bajo contraste en todas sus imágenes, esta film de 35 mm le ayudará a crear hermosos retratos con una iluminación espectacular. También se utiliza comúnmente en fotografía técnica para reproducir imágenes sin imponer fuertes restricciones de contraste. Una mirada final suave.
|Color:||B & amp; W|
|Tamaño del paquete:||1|
Para comprender más sobre los detalles anteriores, puedeecha un vistazo a nuestra guía de film o si quieres algo de inspiración, dirígete a nuestra página eneligiendo tu próxima film. Y si desea conocer todos los detalles sobre la film, incluida la información técnica,leer sobre Foma Retropan en EMULSIVE.
Foma tiene sus orígenes en Praga en 1919. Desde entonces han permanecido en la República Checa, trabajando durante el siglo pasado en diferentes películas, papeles y productos químicos para uso de las escuelas de medicina y el ejército, así como fotógrafos ordinarios en Europa del Este. Sus películas en blanco y negro son el resultado de décadas de experiencia, ¡no te decepcionará!
Para obtener más información sobre la marca, consulte nuestra biografía deFoma
Cuando nos compre la film de su cámara, podemos enviarla a todo el Reino Unido, Europa, EE. UU., Nueva Zelanda, Australia y Canadá, ¡más países planeados pronto! Así que comprar su Foma Retropan película de 35 mm B & amp; W ISO 320 hoy y volver sumergirse en la diversión de la fotografía de 35mm film!y!
I shot a roll of Foma Repropan with my Contax 139 Quartz, and knowing from reading previous reviews that it's low contrast, I thought that, especially as it was quite a bright day, I'd use an Orange filter to both help with the light situation and to bring out the contrast a little. The results were that my negatives were quite nice....until I came to scan them! It apears that the emulsion must be quite fragile as, despite me dilligence with handling the film, most frames had some marks. I tried carefully cleaning the negatives, but the result was the same. Maybe(?) the film doesn't like being developed in HC110 B, I don't know...I've never shot it before. That said though, once I'd done a bit of work on the scans with Affinity Photo (something I'm only just starting out with) I managed to get some reasonable images.
Would I shoot it again? YES I would, but maybe try a different developer next time.
The Foma Retropan 320 is a nice film, for close ups that is. I really wouldn't recommend the film for landscapes. I found the film to sometimes be quite flat and lacking in contrast. Close up shots did however show better contrasts and tones than landscapes.
The film is recommended to be developed with a special Foma developer but I developed the film with Ilfosol 3, using the recommended developer may have given me different results. I may retry the film again one day with the recommended developer.
I would definitely reccomend this for some creative close up work, that soft and grainy detail works so well for that sort of thing. I found it not so great for landscape and portraits but I enjoyed shooting the spring bloom on it.
I'll start with saying that I'm a big fan of Foma. All the Fomapan films (100, 200 and 400) I've had great results from. And I'd been cautiously looking at Retropan for a while; I say 'cautiously' because I was interested in it even though it didn't sound like my kind of film. Low on contrast and can be very grainy? Nah - not for me. But I was still interested in giving it a go!
And the results were.... Yes, it is grainy. And it does lack in contrast.
I know....! I was warned!!
But apart from it doing what I was told it would do, I also found it inconsistent and a bit... weird. I quite liked it on some close up detail shots - the grain works nicely there. But for everything else I just can't see anything apart from the grain. For landscapes it loses everything - any subtleties are completely lost. And yet the tonality of the film (once I'd tweaked the shadows and highlights) is actually quite nice. But it seems to be different from frame to frame - and whatever a film is doing, I tend to like it to be consistent.
It looks like the film has been pushed. Which is fine - if you want a pushed grainy film then be my guest; that aesthetic can work very well. But I'm not entirely sure who this film is made for. It doesn't give a particularly 'retro' look; it's not good for landscape, and for grainy street photography I'd be more inclined to grab some Fomapan 100 and push it if I wanted more grain.
And yet I can't really mark it down too much as I do quite like the tonality. Maybe it just has a very specific purpose - as I said, I did like it on some detail shots. But I'd suggest trying it out before you do anything important with it.
This is *very* soft. I've shot a couple of rolls of this now and I'm happy enough with some of the pictures, but by no means all. I really like the softness on portraits, particularly with the lens wide open.
I'm not so keen on things like finely detailed greenery. They ended up a bit of a mush, to be honest.
It's surprisingly nice for simpler shots like that though.
It's really not my favourite black and white film, but it is cheap. I'll probably buy it again, but make sure I'm using it to it's best advantage.