AgfaPhoto APX Film 35mm B&W ISO 400
Our Price: £5.00 GBP100080
Rated ISO 400 but with the potential to be pushed to 1600 without a significant drop in quality, this 35mm black and white film is perfect for low-light conditions, creative imagery, and fast-moving (sports and children!) photography
To understand more about the details above you can check out our film guide or if you want some inspiration then head over to our page on choosing your next film. And if you want the full details about the film, including technical information, read about AgfaPhoto APX over on EMULSIVE.
AgfaPhoto is the film photography spin-off of the much-bigger German corporation Agfa-Gevaert. It's film heritage stretches back to 1964 when it began producing B&W films aimed at the consumer market but was set up as a separate organisation in 2004 to allow the parent company to focus on other industries. Much smaller now than it's heyday in the 80s and 90s, Agfa is known for film that is affordable and reliable - and had a passionate following in Poundland until recently.
For more information about the brand check out our bio of AgfaPhoto
All sample photos (c) Dennis Skley
Where we ship
When you buy your camera film from us we can ship it across the UK, Europe, USA, New Zealand, Australia and Canada (more countries planned soon!) So buy your AgfaPhoto APX Film 35mm B&W ISO 400 today and dive back into the fun of 35mm film photography!
Very impressive b&w film, and at this price, snap it up!
First time using this film and happy with the results. It's got good tonal range and nice crisp contrast. Compares well to my results with HP5.
I didn’t expect much when buying this but I love it! Used it between 400iso 1600 and it worked brilliantly
My first film use for 17 years and I went Monochrome because it has always appealed to me more than colour. As a 'now' beginner, I found the 400 speed useful in poor light and especially for my less steady camera work. Allowing for my inexperience I found the images quite good, with acceptable blacks (they could have been a bit stronger/darker).
Most pics were landscapes or still life objects and definition was good. The results I have at the moment are only scans of the negs by the processor, so prints from the negs would probably much better.