I home developed this film in ID-11, and used a Pentax auto 110 Super. The photos have a good dynamic range, preserving highlights and shadows. It is grainy, but that is a product of the films miniature size.

The only limitations with this film is the inherent limitations of the 110 format. But to me limitations are what creates good art, not what prohibits it.

I have cut down t-max film and put it into 110 canisters and Lomography orca holds up very well.

I love this film stock. Shot in my Pentax auto 110, I was surprised by the detail in my negatives considering 110 is known for its lack of sharpness and image quality. I feel like this film has a lot of character, it does lack in contrast but that’s an easy fix in editing.

I don't have the best 110 camera, so I don't know how much is me, how much is the camera and how much is the film, but when it clicked together, there was some nice grain and contrast. It's not a lowlight film in any way, shape or form.

I dabbled with 100 some 40+ years ago with a Minolta 110 SLR. But I never shot B&W until 2020 when I was given a pocket 110 camera from the late 70s and decided to give Lomography Orca a go. I was pleasantly surprised, the contrast is really good and the grain is not intrusive as long as you don't look too close - which is what you expect from 110 film anyway. It's easy enough to shoot as most 110 cameras were designed for 100 ISO film, and I developed it myself in regular B&W chemicals. Definitely a nice option alongside the Lomography Tiger film, which is great but 200ASA doesn't sit well with 110 cameras which were designed for 100 or 400 ASA in the main.

don't expect anything amazing but it does the job for a bit off a laugh using an old crap 110 camera
Sure if you put it in a Pentax 110 you might get some reasonable results