Fujifilm Instax Wide Film - B&W


Price:
Sale price£14.00
Notify Me When Available

Pickup currently unavailable at Analogue Wonderland HQ

Carbon-neutral shipping with Shopify Planet
Carbon-neutral shipping on all orders

Description

Payment & Security

American Express Apple Pay Diners Club Discover Google Pay Klarna Maestro Mastercard PayPal Shop Pay Union Pay Visa

Your payment information is processed securely. We do not store credit card details nor have access to your credit card information.

You may also like

Customer Reviews

Based on 3 reviews
0%
(0)
67%
(2)
33%
(1)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
R
Ryan F.
Perfect for: Great All-Rounder, Beginners, Portraits, Landscapes
Accreditation Handles: @ryanfayers.photography
A good stock, but not as good as colour counter part.

The Instax wide black and white (B&W) variation, is a decent well-rounded stock. It has strong versatility with its 800 ISO, combined with any flash, making it an ease to make nice tangible photographs. In turn making it ideal for casual use, documenting special occasions, and so on. I find the novelty of it being black and white, also suits well for making nostalgic feeling outcomes. Though I do find that the tonality of the negatives in person are slightly tinted blue, more noticeable when capturing darker subjects, which in turn I find myself up editing most my b&w Instax’s (like the example photo) to draw out a ‘true’ black and white. Despite this the images, have great contrast to them with minimal noise, though it prone to rendering highlights quite hot, but leaving darker aspects feeling a little washed out.

Which brings me onto the main criticism of this stock, the reality for any use, be it professional project or simple fun photography, the colour variant is far superior. It not only gives great capacity to edit in post, allowing you to turn them to black and white with greater control of tonality, but simply makes for better tangible gifts and mementos. As result of it creating stronger sense of nostalgic outcomes, which I find down to the tonality being closer to Kodaks; Colour and Gold stocks. In turn I recommended it for experimental purposes, or very specific projects, but if toying between this stock or colour, go for the colour it’s a lot safer bet.
Other small points:

The tab for writing on Instax can be picky, I found paint pens to be less effective than ink markers, best course of action is to test a dud / poor quality exposure.

It simply cheaper to buy the colour stock in big packs of 50 exposures, than it is for 10 for £14.99 (which is still fairly cheap for this stock)

Using a microfiber cloth, with a tiny touch of water helps remove any annoying fingerprints marks (inevitable really for the medium).

I have found with the colour variant, that the quality control on some packs varies hugely, with it creating these ‘brun’ marks on the image. Though I am yet to experience this on the black and white, I dare say it exists. However, I have never ruined an image, in some ways it has its own charm.

Thanks for reading, hope it helps :)

J
John F. (Hounslow, GB)
Perfect for: Pinhole/Long-Exposure, Creative/Abstract
Accreditation Handles: John Furlong
A better choice for pinhole images than the colour version

Here's a result from an f/233 pinhole camera in combination with the Lomo Graflok adapter. Exposure was measured with the Pinhole Master app which had been set up for 800 ASA and the reciprocity correction set to ON. The resulting exposure was 5m 24s - Pinhole Master created a log file so the info. is readily available. Some post-processing was used - mainly levels and sharpening and overall I'm pleased with result. I reckon at least 3 or more stops overexposure is necessary to allow for the films' acknowledged reciprocity weakness.

G
Gavin R. (Forfar, GB)
Perfect for: Beginners, Portraits, Street Photography, Architecture, Creative/Abstract, Travel, Studio work
Hard to nail the exposure, but when it works, boy does it work!

This has a narrower exposure latitude and lower dynamic range than 35mm negative film. I shot these images using a Lomo Instant Wide and I found the exposure a bit hit and miss. While some of that could be blamed on the metering of the camera, the film itself seems quite unforgiving. If you don't mind the £1.40 a shot, you can bracket your images to achieve the best possible results. Speaking personally, I do mind spending £4.20 for a single shot! Even then, the dynamic range of the film might not be sufficient to capture the shadows and highlights of a scene. That said, art is often defined more by its constraints than its capabilities, and there is definitely some potential here for very satisfying photography.

The golden age of instant photography is over so I think you'll struggle to do better than Instax film. I had originally thought of getting a Mint RF70 camera for shooting Instax but now that I have some experience with it, I'm not sure the quality of the film really warrants spending big bucks on a camera to shoot it in. Don't get me wrong, I am enjoying shooting it, but Instax in general can be a bit frustrating.

The monochrome film seems more finnicky than the colour, but the images are more striking when they do turn out. Periodically you get such mind-blowing images it seems worth it. And of course, the feeling of a almost full size print popping out of your camera and developing before your eyes is magic!

Be Inspired by the Film Community

Recently viewed