I found this film quite good for landscapes and architecture, as it handled the details of the photos very well. however, being quite a low speed film, it didn't handle low light very well (perhaps this was my metering, but see the 3rd photo find in daylight under shade). trichromes quite nicely as well (2nd photo). overall good cheap alternative, though I did notice quite a bit of sprocket tearing and when loading the film did tear a lot (this could just be my technique, though this hasn't happened before now).

This is my first time out with Fomapan 200, and definitely not my last. It has a serious depth to it, but is perhaps not as forgiving as TriX. That said, this is a film that can really perform, especially in full sun. I’m looking forward to using it more, and will certainly keep a roll in my camera bag from now on…

Solid alternative when Ilford is to expensive. Not a lot of contrast so I tend to push it.

Once again I experimented with an inexpensive B/W film. The results were interesting. This is a good film for getting a vintage, old school, retro kind of vibe and this can work in many contexts.

I ought to point out that this particular film came without a DX code so as a newbie to modern film photography I got a bit of a surprise. AW, however, are both helpful and good communicators.

An excellent film for most things at a very reasonable price. This is my go to B&W film. Scans well and gives good contast. Sample shots taken on a Voightlander Vito B with the less common but brilliant f/2.8 lens.