One of the relatively few 35mm films I use, as it lacks grain and produces sharp results.

I've developed 2 rolls of Delta 100: first in R09 @ 1+100; and the second in Perceptol 1+3 The first was much better than expected with a full range of tones. Exposure had to be correct or detail was lost in the shadows. In Perceptol there is a fine grain, a full range of tones with plenty of detail in the highlights and more detail in the shadows than with R09. This is my favourite film for landscape.

I had been very keen to try this professional quality film, so what would I load it into? Canon A-1? Minolta XG-M? I decided to give it a go in my 1960s Balda Super Matic with a broken, built-in Selenium Cell meter. Sunny 16s in a woodland park with dark shadows and bright highlights isn't easy or always successful, but the latitude of this film saved a few shots. Contrast, tonality and lack of grain make for very pleasing results and this film has all of that.

Quite contrasty, which I guess you either like or you don't. Depending whether contrast floats your boat.

This was pretty evenly-lit, from memory but the sky's blown.

Nice gritty feel to a set of pics shot as part of an ongoing project.

This has everything I'm looking for in a medium speed film. It has wonderful tonality and bags of detail. I'm not keen on very high contrast, so developed in Ilfotec DD-X I love the results. If you need more punch in your negs, you may have to push your development a little, but I like a neutral starting point.