I popped a couple of rolls of this through a Yashica 635 on a dull and wet day, watching some Cyclocross.

The Foma Ortho 400 film cut nicely through the gloom, and did slightly increase the contrast between the red spectrum of the mud and turning leaves, with the green spectrum grass.

The grain was pleasingly not overbearing.

Developed in a Paterson Tank (it went on the spiral incredibly easily, so another recent film I reviewed, which misbehaved massively, I now know wasn’t down to me!) in stock ID-11. Very curly film to get flat for scanning, but worth it for the results.

I didnt know what to expect from this film, since I had tried the 35mm and was unsuccessful. But I love the results. It is quite versatile and can cope in bright light and dark.

i bought this film simply to test out a new camera, didnt expect a great deal from it. Well shows what i know. love the results i got. For the money this is a really nice film well worth you giving it a go.

I've not had a chance to print with this yet in the darkroom, but based on the initial scans from the Wonderlab i am excited to do so. These samples were shot on an overcast wet afternoon and it was interesting to see how the greens would fair. Looking at the skies I think next time I would try with a yellow filter, however the clarity and subtlties in the midtones are lovely and will be great in portraiture.

This is a film for experienced photographers who are willing to experiment. I have been playing with this film past few months; it's certainly more affordable alternative to currently available rollei and Ilford orthochromatic films some of which I simply cannot justify for regular use. If you are an old timer returning to classic photography be prepared this is a modern film that does not always behave the way orthochromatic film would have more than half a century [or longer] ago. if you are new to orthochromatic films be aware that this film is not really sensitive to reds; in the old days all films were orthochromatic, sensitive to greens and blues and not to reds. This is why very specific selective make up had to be applied and why a lot of actors in old films look over powdered. Superb for landscapes and adventurous when making art (alternative) portraits; skin tones will go darker and make most people look like they got a dark tan, facial features such as scars, freckles or moles will stand out as they also turn dark and some faces will look well lived in if not aged with highlighted . Aa any tones of red are returned as dark or black you have to factor this in if your scene covers warm yellows, orange or red hues. This film can return a very high contrast and is very tricky to expose if you want to avoid blowing highlights and not to lose details in shadows. super tricky to reverse to a positive. I would say shooting this sensitive film at box speed is just about right and you have to be accurate with developments times, and be patient if experimenting with reversal. I have found the technical data sheet confusing but it may be that it is just not very well translated into English.
I would agree that the contour sharpness is good, fine grain for a 400 film, high maximum density of the silver image; its exposure latitude is wide enough if used as a negative film; if you want to reverse I would say you have to expose very accurately. Underexposure is easier than over. When reversing using Ilford chemistry - Indoor and indirect artificial lighting and adverse lighting conditions gave me consistently better results than well lit outdoor scenes with higher contrast.
Works ok on overcast days and in lower contrast situations.
If you want to run a few rolls and experiment it may be worth collecting a a box of rolls on your next trip to Czechia where you can get it at a resonantly low price.