Compared to the saturation of, say, Ultramax, I find my shots looked almost desaturated, but in fact this film produces realistic, true to life colours. Great film for beginners and those just starting out with film, I reckon. Shot on my LomoApparat.

I am a little bit disappointed with this film. I had very high hopes after seeing example images, but the pictures I got weren’t as good as I expected. I shot this stock during my recent trip to Spain, and maybe because the landscape is already so orange and yellow, the film’s inherent orange tint made the photos look too orangey. I did get some nice shots as well, so maybe this film works better elsewhere—perhaps for city photography or during winter. I’ll probably give it another try in a different setting. I was hesitating between giving it 3 or 4 stars, but in the end it’s 4, as the shots aren’t terrible. It just didn’t match my (maybe exaggerated) expectations.

While this is a decent film I think I'd rather use a Kodak or Fuji 400.
Nice tones, slight hue but sometimes has some leakage

My first roll, and now my favourite film. Made all my holiday photos look stunning. I love the warm colours and halation. Going to try 200 & 800 next.

I’ve shot with both Candido 200 and 800 to date and absolutely loved them - so was super excited to receive 400 in a recent AW blind box.

It was in my bag for our fortnight in the Scottish Highlands, and the first I reached for to load up as I thought it’d no doubt be my favourite.

It was… okay. I can’t articulate the exact problem, but it just doesn’t feel as awesome as some of the shots I’ve got from 200 and 800 before. It’s respectable, but it’s lacking the same vintage film feel that I was hoping for and got from its sibilings.