I’m torn about I feel about this. It can yield fun results. Grainy and unsaturated and tends to blow out highlights. In overcast situations render almost tungsten like blue hues. Interesting stuff. Not for the Portra crowd.

Didn't love this film, felt a bit muted and had less halation than I was hoping for and was grainier than I expected.
I feel like I could have achieved a similar result with filter options and preferrable stock. In its defense I didn't quite find the right day or situation for it and maybe this would have worked better in Kodak Gold territory

I see a lot of people didn't like this. I'm quite the opposite. I did. I personally liked it's muted colour palette which pairs up quite nicely with greens and forest. Makes it look quite rustic. Would recommend to others to try it.

I really like the big grain on this film. I wasn't sure about the colours at first, because from the name "Glow" I was expecting a warm feel to the images, but the washed out tones won me over after a while.

From the roll I shot, I felt it suited bright contrasty scenes best.

unfortunately used this in low light and indoors when it’s probably suited to bright outdoor environments. it still got some nice photos but any grievances are mostly my fault.

I didn't get the vivid colours the filmstock claims, what I did get was a very nice undersaturated colour palette with a distinct, yet controlled grain structure. The effect these two factors give is, at times, almost painterly.

It's not a stock for all situations at all, but it most certainly does have a place, and it's nice to see stock as experimental as this on the market. My only issue was that for a claimed 27 shots, I only got 26 from my Canon A1 (which is normally on the money in terms of frames per roll).

Having recently started up shooting film again, I'm having great fun with experimenting with all manner of different films - sadly I feel that this film won't be getting another purchase as it's a bit of a dud!

Not that much of a fan of the colours, saturation or how the images come out - but they definitely have a very particular aesthetic to them which you may be aiming for - otherwise would suggest giving it a miss

I got this in a mystery box and having seen some reviews on YouTube, I wasn't expecting it to be much good. But I think going in with the knowledge that it does tone down the saturation and give an old timey golden glow means you can choose your subject to suit its capabilities. I went to the tall ships festival at Hartlepool and took photos around the garden etc. and I am very pleased with the results. I am just beginning (again) with 35mm film so there are some duff ones but that was me!

I took okay ish pictures with this, but it only became truly vivid in really bright sunlight which was a bit disappointing especially for a film that is 400 iso.

This film is so great, the colours it produces are so unique in every image. I highly recommend

I see a lot of people didn't like this. I'm quite the opposite. I did. I personally liked it's muted colour palette which pairs up quite nicely with greens and forest. Makes it look quite rustic. Would recommend to others to try it.

Just had my first reel of this developed after receiving it in a mystery box. I’m currently in Beirut and the guy who processed the film was so impressed by its saturation and colour palette, also the cleanliness of the negatives. I loved the results too, lovely cinematic urban shots!