I’ve run a few rolls of Kentmere 400 through my Fuji STX-2, and it’s a pretty reliable high-speed film for the price. It handles low light well, which is great for those moody, overcast days or shooting indoors without too much grain showing up. The contrast is a bit punchier than Kentmere 100, which can really make your shots pop, especially in street scenes. It’s not as fine-grained as some pricier 400-speed films like Ilford HP5, but for a budget option, it holds up well. If you’re after a film that gives you flexibility in different lighting, this is a good one to keep in your bag.

so kentmere 400, is it worth it, do i save money and not buy Ilford, yer course it is. its a cracking daily shoot film. very forgiving, easy to handle in processing. its been my film of choice for the Frugal Film Project all of 2024. go on now give a turn.

This was my first attempt shooting with B&W 35mm film. For a low price film I was really happy with the fine grain and good results indoor and out. Would definitely recommend as an excellent all-rounder.

Loved using it, came out with some really nice shots, great all-rounder!

I've shot Kentmere Pan 400 a couple of times, with both occasions producing fairly flat, low contrast images with great detail. I think the price, coupled with the high detail and seemingly wide latitude, make it ideal for those new to film photography. I just find it a bit boring to be honest.
3 stars for the film, 1 extra star for value.
For a cheap b&w film with more character (but less forgiving), I'd suggest Fomapan 400 over this.